Candidate, Pamela Singh
People's Party of Canada Party, Surrey - Newton, BC
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: unknown
Rating Comments: This candidate has not yet responded to CLC’s 2021 federal election questionnaire, so candidate's views on our issues are not yet known.
Percentage in last election: 2.6% (2021)
Victory margin last election: -51.3% (2021)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Constituency Offices
, British Columbia
Here is Pamela Singh's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Pamela Singh. | ||
There are no quotes for Pamela Singh at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Pamela Singh on Sep. 20, 2021.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? | No response |
| Do you support the conscience rights of health care professionals to refuse to do or refer for medical procedures which they oppose? | No response |
| If elected, would you vote in favour of a law to protect all unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? | No response |
| If elected, will you vote to pass laws protecting people from euthanasia and assisted-suicide, and vote to reject laws that would expand euthanasia and assisted-suicide? | No response |
| Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) | No response |
There are no videos available for Pamela Singh.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.