Voting Records

Candidate, Daniele Ritacca

People's Party of Canada Party, Saint-Léonard - Saint-Michel, QC

Bio

Daniele Ritacca
Supportable
Supportable
CLC rating: Pro-Life
Rating Comments: Based on a discussion with a CLC Leader, Daniele was deemed to be pro-life
Percentage in last election: 3.75% (2021)
Victory margin last election: -65.63% (2021)
Religion / Faith: unknown

Contact

Daniele Ritacca
Parliamentary Office
Constituency Offices , Quebec
H1G 4G3
Daniele Ritacca

Here is Daniele Ritacca's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Daniele Ritacca.
Daniele Ritacca

There are no quotes for Daniele Ritacca at this time.

Daniele Ritacca

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Daniele Ritacca on 2021.

Question Response
If elected, will you vote to pass laws protecting people from euthanasia and assisted-suicide, and vote to reject laws that would expand euthanasia and assisted-suicide? --
If elected, would you vote in favour of a law to protect all unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? --
Do you support the conscience rights of health care professionals to refuse to do or refer for medical procedures which they oppose? --
Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? --
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) --
Daniele Ritacca

There are no videos available for Daniele Ritacca.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.