Voting Records > English Public School Trustee > British Columbia > Search for your English Public School Trustee > Candidate, Amanda Tengo
Candidate, Amanda Tengo
Independent Party, Vancouver School District 39, BC
Electoral District: At large
Bio



CLC rating: Pro-parental rights, anti-sexualization of kids
Rating Comments: Is running on a campaign to stop SOGI 123 (radical LGBT sex curriculum), and to protect children from sexualization. She also opposes Marxist-inspired, race-bating, Critical Race Theory being taught in schools. Finally, this wonderful, sensible candidate, opposes Covd mandates for children, which have been proven to produce tremendous physical and psychological harm to kids.
Percentage in last election: 1.0% (2022)
Victory margin last election: -3.1% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact

Parliamentary Office
British Columbia
Constituency Offices
Vancouver, British Columbia

Here is Amanda Tengo's voting record relating to life and family issues:
Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
---|---|---|
There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Amanda Tengo. |

There are no quotes for Amanda Tengo at this time.

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Amanda Tengo on 2022.
Question | Response |
---|---|
Do you agree that parents, not the state, have the inherent right of primacy in education of children? | yes (based on public statements) |
Will you defend the inherent right of parents to be notified in advance regarding any lesson, speaker or presentation involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | yes (based on public statements) |
Do you agree that parents should have the right to withdraw their children from classroom lessons or presentations involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | yes (based on public statements) |

There are no videos available for Amanda Tengo.
- Legend for Light Rating System
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
-
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
-
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.