Trustee David Swankey
Chilliwack School District (SD33), BC
Electoral District: At large
Bio
CLC rating: Anti-parental rights, pro-LGBT ideology
Rating Comments: Swankey is a radical ideologue who publicly defended a pornographic book for students in Chilliwack schools. He also voted against a motion to create an “Informed Parental Consent” policy which would help protect children from this sort of in-school sexual grooming.
Position: Trustee
Percentage in last election: 8.2% (2022)
Victory margin last election: 1.1% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Chilliwack School District (SD33) Office
8430 Cessna Drive
Chilliwack, British Columbia
V2P 7K4
Tel: 604-792-1321
Constituency Offices
Chilliwack, British Columbia
Here is David Swankey's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for David Swankey. | ||
There are no quotes for David Swankey at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by David Swankey on 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you agree that parents, not the state, have the inherent right of primacy in education of children? | No (based on voting record) |
| Will you defend the inherent right of parents to be notified in advance regarding any lesson, speaker or presentation involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | No (based on voting record) |
| Do you agree that parents should have the right to withdraw their children from classroom lessons or presentations involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | No (based on voting record) |
There are no videos available for David Swankey.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.