Voting Records

Candidate, Judi Partridge

Liberal Party, Flamborough-Glanbrook, ON

Bio

Judi Partridge
Not Supportable
Not Supportable
CLC rating: Pro-abortion, Anti-free speech, Supports radical sex ed
Rating Comments: Partridge is a rabid anti-life, anti-family politician who did much harm to our cherised Canadian freedoms while she served as a Hamilton City Councillor. In 2014, she voted in favour of a motion asking the federal government to take away the free speech rights of pro-life activists, by banning the display of pro-life ads or banners. As a Councillor, she also voted in favour of a transgender ideology "bathroom bill" that granted biological males the legal right to access girls washrooms, changerooms and showers in all public spaces throughout Hamilton. During an all-candidates meeting in May 2018, she defended Kathleen Wynne's radical sex curriculum for children as young as 6-years old, which was written under the direction of a convicted pedophile, Wynne's former Deputy Education Minister, Ben Levin, who served 3 years in prison for sexual crimes against children. During the debate she also lied to a voter who asked a question about parental rights in education, suggesting that the Liberal government allows parents to opt-out their children from controversial lessons, when the exact opposite is true. Kathleen Wynne sent two lawyers to court to argue that a Hamilton father had NO RIGHT to withdraw his children from lessons dealing with transgenderism, homosexuality, abortion or contraception. The Liberal government won the court case, and that father is still today denied the right to know what his children are being taught about sex, much less withdraw them from the lessons.
Previous Occupation: Hamilton City Councillor
Religion / Faith: unknown

Contact

Judi Partridge
Parliamentary Office
Ontario
Constituency Offices Flamborough, Ontario
Judi Partridge

Here is Judi Partridge's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
Explicit 2010/2015 sex education curriculum
The Ontario Liberal government of Kathleen Wynne & Dalton McGuinty introduced a sex ed curriculum for the 2010 school year that would have forced public & Catholic elementary schools to encourage masturbation, celebrate homosexuality and gender identity confusion, and teach about anal and oral intercourse. The curriculum sought to give gay-positive teaching on homosexual relationships by Grade 3. In Grade 5 children would be taught that homosexuality is inborn and cannot be changed, a claim that has no scientific backing whatsoever. In Grade 6 it would give instructions on the pleasures of masturbation and discussed vaginal lubrication. In grade 7 children would be taught about "oral" and "anal sex". Thanks to public outcry from parents and religious leaders, this dangerous curriculum was "postponed" by the government. However, once Kathleen Wynne received a strong Liberal majority and the threat of an election was past, she announced that the controversial curriculum would be implemented in September 2015. Since the original preview of the curriculum in 2010, it has come to light that it was written under the direction of a man, Benjamin Levin, who has confessed to child pornography related charges. That makes sense given the explicit, age-inappropriate nature of the curriculum. It is feared by many parents and education observers that the curriculum may have been designed to 'groom' children so as to make them available for sex. Other parties with whom the Liberal government consulted to formulate this program included radical gay activists groups like Gay Ontario (now Queer Ontario) and Egale Canada. [Jan. 2010-present]
Supports bad
Position on the right of parents to withdraw kids from classroom lessons that parents view as morally inappropriate or controversial.
Opposes bad
Not Supportable
Life & family issues voting score: 0%
Judi Partridge

There are no quotes for Judi Partridge at this time.

Judi Partridge

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Judi Partridge on 2018.

Question Response
Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? no response
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: a surgical or medical intervention, designed to prevent the death of the mother but but which results in the unintended and undesired death of the pre-born child, is not an abortion. e.g. in cases of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) Yes (based on voting record)
Will you support measures to stop funding abortions with taxpayers' money in Ontario? no response
Do you agree women have the right to be thoroughly informed about the serious health consequences of abortion, the development of the child in the womb and the alternatives to abortion? no response
Will you support legislation to protect the right of health care workers who refuse to participate in procedures which are in violation of their religious or conscientious beliefs? no response
Will you protect the rights of parents to educate their children according to their faith in matters of moral principles and beliefs concerning abortion, contraception and homosexuality? no response
Will you oppose euthanasia and instead support measures to promote "palliative care", the purpose of which is to alleviate pain, and enhance the quality of life for terminally ill patients and those with disabilities? *Euthanasia is the direct and intentional killing of a person by action or omission, with or without that person's consent, for what people mistakenly believe are compassionate reasons. no response
If elected, will you work to repeal Kathleen Wynne's radical sex ed curriculum? No (based on public statements)
Judi Partridge

There are no videos available for Judi Partridge.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.