Voting Records

Candidate, Ruth Fontaine

People's Party of Canada Party, La Prairie, QC

Bio

Ruth Fontaine
Supportable
Supportable
CLC rating: Pro-life, pro-family
Rating Comments: In an interview with a CLC representative, Ruth was deemed to be pro-life and pro-family.
Percentage in last election: 2.59% (2021)
Victory margin last election: -41.14% (2021)
Religion / Faith: unknown

Contact

Ruth Fontaine
Parliamentary Office
Constituency Offices , Quebec
J5B 0A1
Ruth Fontaine

Here is Ruth Fontaine's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Ruth Fontaine.
Ruth Fontaine

There are no quotes for Ruth Fontaine at this time.

Ruth Fontaine

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Ruth Fontaine on September 3, 2021.

Question Response
Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? --
Do you support the conscience rights of health care professionals to refuse to do or refer for medical procedures which they oppose? --
If elected, would you vote in favour of a law to protect all unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? --
If elected, will you vote to pass laws protecting people from euthanasia and assisted-suicide, and vote to reject laws that would expand euthanasia and assisted-suicide? --
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) --
Ruth Fontaine

There are no videos available for Ruth Fontaine.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.