Candidate, Daniel Hunter
People's Party of Canada Party, Foothills, AB
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Educable
Rating Comments: This candidate gave mostly pro-life answers to CLC’s 2021 federal election questionnaire, but thinks that killing an unborn child by abortion is acceptable if the child was conceived through rape or incest.
Percentage in last election: 7.96% (2021)
Victory margin last election: -61.27% (2021)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Here is Daniel Hunter's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Daniel Hunter. | ||
There are no quotes for Daniel Hunter at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Daniel Hunter on August 26, 2021.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? | yes |
| Do you support the conscience rights of health care professionals to refuse to do or refer for medical procedures which they oppose? | yes |
| If elected, would you vote in favour of a law to protect all unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? | yes |
| If elected, will you vote to pass laws protecting people from euthanasia and assisted-suicide, and vote to reject laws that would expand euthanasia and assisted-suicide? | yes |
| Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) | yes (Incest and rape) |
There are no videos available for Daniel Hunter.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.