Candidate, Val Neekman
Kitchener Mayor, ON
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Position unknown
Rating Comments: Has not yet responded to CLC's 2022 mayoral candidate election survey, therefore the candidate's views on our issues are not yet known.
When asked about his stance on pro-life issues by local voters, he is extremely evasive.
When asked about his stance on pro-life issues by local voters, he is extremely evasive.
Percentage in last election: 9.0% (2022)
Victory margin last election: -71.0% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Ontario
Constituency Offices
, Ontario
Here is Val Neekman's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Val Neekman. | ||
There are no quotes for Val Neekman at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Val Neekman on Sep 26, 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | no response |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | no response |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | no response |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | no response |
There are no videos available for Val Neekman.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.