Trustee Stefano Pascucci
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, ON
Electoral District: Mississauga Ward 04
Bio
CLC rating: Pro-LGBT ideology, Anti-Parental Rights
Rating Comments: On September 27, 2023 this trustee voted in a disgraceful manner, to change the DPCDSB by-law governing Delegations & Submission made by parents at school board meetings, to include new censorship provisions designed to block parents from being able to criticize Gender Identity Theory and LGBT Ideology. This trustee must be removed from office asap.
Percentage in last election: 66.2% (2022)
Victory margin last election: 32.4% (2022)
Religion / Faith: Catholic
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
40 Matheson Boulevard West
Mississauga, Ontario
L5R 1C5
Tel: 416-508-5543
Here is Stefano Pascucci's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Motion (in Committee) to re-introduce the flying of special-interest-group flags at the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board (DPCDSB) This sneaky motion, proposed in early June 2024 by aggressively pro-LGBT Trustee Brea Corbet, would re-introduce the flying of special-interest flags at the DPCDSB. Only shortly before, in April 2024, the DPCDSB had sensibly amended its flag policy to specify that only the national, provincial, and municipal flags may be flown outside of DPCDSB facilities. Trustee Corbet's motion would effectively undermine the principled policy amendment of April, and re-introduce the ability of special-interests pressure-groups, like the notorious LGBT lobby, to symbolically stake their claim on the DPCDSB by raising the Pride flag. The timing of Trustee Corbet's motion, at the beginning of so-called Pride Month (which is actually the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus) is surely no coincidence. Her motion passed at the Policy Review Committee meeting by a vote of 9 to 2 on June 4, 2024, and now will be voted on at the full Board meeting on June 11, 2024. |
Supported |  |
| Motion (in Committee) to specifically exclude the homosexualist Pride flag from being flown at the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board (DPCDSB) This faithfully Catholic motion, introduced in early June 2024 by Trustee Herman Viloria, sought to prevent that scandalous Pride flag from being flown outside on the property of the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board. Sadly, his motion was defeated at the Policy Review Committee meeting by a vote of 9 to 2 on June 4, 2024, due to the anti-Catholic moral indifference of the majority of trustees to the promotion of grave sexual depravity inherent in the Pride flag. |
Opposed | |
| Motion (at Board Meeting) to re-introduce the flying of special-interest-group flags at the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board (DPCDSB) This sneaky motion, proposed in early June 2024 by aggressively pro-LGBT Trustee Brea Corbet, would re-introduce the flying of special-interest flags at the DPCDSB. Only shortly before, in April 2024, the DPCDSB had sensibly amended its flag policy to specify that only the national, provincial, and municipal flags may be flown outside of DPCDSB facilities. Trustee Corbet's motion would effectively undermine the principled policy amendment of April, and re-introduce the ability of special-interests pressure-groups, like the notorious LGBT lobby, to symbolically stake their claim on the DPCDSB by raising the Pride flag. The timing of Trustee Corbet's motion, at the beginning of so-called Pride Month (which is actually the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus) is surely no coincidence. Despite initial support at the committee level for Trustee Corbet's calculated motion, God's will prevailed and the motion was defeated at the Board Meeting on June 11, 2024 by a vote of 6 to 3, with 2 trustees absent. |
Absent | -- |
 |
||
| Life & family issues voting score: | 0% | |
There are no quotes for Stefano Pascucci at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Stefano Pascucci on Sept 29, 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Will you work to ensure that Catholic schools do not invite guest speakers who have publicly expressed positions that contradict the morality and teaching of the Church, no matter how great their achievements in politics, business, sports, science or the arts? | no response |
| Will you work to ensure that educational materials that enter the premises of Catholic schools (e.g., library resources, curriculum texts, awareness campaigns, flyers) and all approved school activities are consistent with and do not undermine the morality and teachings of the Church? | no response |
| Will you work to ensure that your Catholic school board enacts a policy requiring all agents and employees of the board to uphold the rights of custodial parents to direct and control the education of, and any medical treatment provided to, their dependent children attending its schools? | no response |
| Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion*? (*Note: a surgical or medical intervention designed to prevent the death of the mother but which results in the unintended and undesired death of the pre-born child, is not an abortion) | no response |
| Will you work to ensure that your Board publicly promotes total fidelity to the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church? (Current examples include the illicitness of abortion, contraception and homosexual practice) | no response |
| Will you oppose sex-ed programs which are contrary to Church teaching? | no response |
| Given that the Gay Pride flag is a controversial political symbol which contradicts Church teaching on marriage & human sexuality, will you oppose any and all proposals to fly the Gay Pride flag at Catholic schools, at the board office, or to acknowledge and celebrate June as Pride month? | no response |
There are no videos available for Stefano Pascucci.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
-
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.