Councillor John Dueck
Rhineland, MB
Electoral District: Ward 3
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Unknown
Rating Comments: Survey not yet sent
Position: Councillor
Percentage in last election: 33.5% (2022)
Victory margin last election: 15.8% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Rhineland Municipality
109 3rd Ave NE, Box 270
Altona, Manitoba
R0G 0B0
Tel: 204-324-4140 (mobile)
Constituency Offices
109 3rd Ave NE, Box 270
Altona, Manitoba
R0G 0B0
Tel: 204-324-4140 (mobile)
Here is John Dueck's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for John Dueck. | ||
There are no quotes for John Dueck at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by John Dueck on 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | survey not yet sent |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | survey not yet sent |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | survey not yet sent |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | survey not yet sent |
There are no videos available for John Dueck.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.