Councillor Dusty Smith
Hope, BC
Electoral District: At large
Bio
CLC rating: Unknown
Rating Comments: CLC's emailed Dusty in regard to the November 25, 2023 byelection, to find out his stance on life issues. Thus far, Dusty has not responded, so his views are unknown.
First elected (yyyy.mm.dd): 11.25.2023
Previous Occupation: Scrap metal, former town councillor
Percentage in last election: 36.9 % (2023)
Victory margin last election: 1.2% (8 votes 2023)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Here is Dusty Smith's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Dusty Smith. | ||
There are no quotes for Dusty Smith at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Dusty Smith on 2023.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | survey not yet sent |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | survey not yet sent |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | survey not yet sent |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | survey not yet sent |
There are no videos available for Dusty Smith.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.