Candidate, Jeffrey Martin
Independent Party, Maple Ridge, BC
Electoral District: At large
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Unknown
Rating Comments: CLC’s 2022 election survey has not been sent because we could not find an email address for this candidate.
Contact
Parliamentary Office
British Columbia
Constituency Offices
Maple Ridge, British Columbia
Here is Jeffrey Martin's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Jeffrey Martin. | ||
There are no quotes for Jeffrey Martin at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Jeffrey Martin on 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | survey not sent |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | survey not sent |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | survey not sent |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | survey not sent |
There are no videos available for Jeffrey Martin.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.