Willow Reichelt
Chilliwack School District (SD33) - BC
Electoral District: At large
Bio
CLC rating: Anti-parental rights, pro-LGBT ideology
Rating Comments: Reichelt is a radical ideologue who publicly defended a quasi-pornographic children’s book which was accused of sexually grooming children, and which depicted “boy-on-boy” sexual situations.
Position: Chair
Percentage in last election: 8.5% (2022)
Victory margin last election: 1.3% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Chilliwack School District (SD33) Office
8430 Cessna Drive
Chilliwack, British Columbia
V2P 7K4
Tel: 604-792-1321
Constituency Offices
Chilliwack, British Columbia
Here is Willow Reichelt's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
 |
||
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Willow Reichelt. | ||
There are no quotes for Willow Reichelt at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Willow Reichelt on 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you agree that parents, not the state, have the inherent right of primacy in education of children? | No (based on voting record) |
| Will you defend the inherent right of parents to be notified in advance regarding any lesson, speaker or presentation involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | No (based on voting record) |
| Do you agree that parents should have the right to withdraw their children from classroom lessons or presentations involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | No (based on voting record) |
There are no videos available for Willow Reichelt. If you have relevant video from all-candidate meetings or other functions that is not copyrighted by a third party, please send it to us.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
-
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.