Provincial Voting Records

MLA Uzoma Asagwara

New Democratic Party, Union Station, MB

Bio

Uzoma Asagwara
Not Supportable
CLC rating: Pro-Transgender ideology; pro-abortion
Rating Comments: MLA Uzoma Asagwara appears to be a female in her photo on the Manitoba NDP's website, but she refers to herself in her biography as "non-binary", which is a made-up, LGBT sophism for someone suffering from a personality disorder. Throughout her biography, Uzoma uses the pronoun "they" to reinforce a multiple personality projection. Ironically, prior to being elected as an MLA, Uzoma was a "psychiatric nurse and addictions specialist".

Pro-abortion rating based on an official policy statement by the NDP, on behalf of all NDP candidates, which asserted abortion as “a woman’s right to choose”. This pro-abortion statement was posted April 5th on the NDP’s website during the 2016 provincial election.
Position: Deputy Premier, Minister of Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care
First elected (yyyy.mm.dd): 2019.09.10
Previous Occupation: psychiatric nurse and addictions specialist
Percentage in last election: 70.0% (2023)
Victory margin last election: 52.7% (2023)
Religion / Faith: unknown

Contact

Uzoma Asagwara
Parliamentary Office
Room 302 Legislative Building
450 Broadway
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3C 0V8
Tel: (204) 945-3731
Constituency Offices
Unit 210B - 254 Edmonton Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3B 2G9
Tel: (204) 306-8581

Here is Uzoma Asagwara's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
Not Supportable
Bill 207, 2nd reading, to create No Free Speech "BUFFER ZONES" on public property
This blatantly pro-abortion, private member's bill, introduced by NDP MLA Nahanni Fontaine, was a more extreme sequel to her failed 2018 bill that sought to outlaw peaceful, pro-life expression on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within a radious of up to 150 metres around all of Manitoba's abortion mills. In her 2021 version, MLA Fontaine included trying to ban peaceful, pro-life witness even around schools. Fortunately, this unconstitutional and totalitarian bill was defeated at 2nd Reading by a vote of 30 Nays over 20 Yeas on Oct. 14, 2021.
Supported bad

There are no quotes for Uzoma Asagwara at this time.

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Uzoma Asagwara on 2023.

Question Response
Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? --
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion?
[Note: A surgical or medical intervention, designed to prevent the death of the mother (e.g. In the case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) but which results in the unintended and undesired death of the pre-born child, is not an abortion.]
All circumstances (per party policy)
Will you support measures to stop funding abortions with taxpayers’ money in Manitoba? No (per party policy)
Do you agree women have the right to be thoroughly informed about the serious health consequences of abortion, the development of their child in the womb and the alternatives to abortion? --
Will you protect the rights of parents to educate their children according to their faith in matters of moral principles and beliefs concerning abortion, contraception and homosexuality? --
Will you oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, and instead, support measures to promote “palliative care”, the purpose of which is to alleviate pain, and enhance the quality of life for terminally ill patients and those with disabilities? [Note: Euthanasia is the direct and intentional killing of a person by action or omission, with or without that person’s consent, for what people mistakenly believe are compassionate reasons.] --
Will you support legislation to protect the right of health care workers who refuse to participate in procedures which are in violation of their religious or conscientious beliefs? --

There are no videos available for Uzoma Asagwara. If you have relevant video from all-candidate meetings or other functions that is not copyrighted by a third party, please send it to us.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.