Petition

Dr. Terence Davids' Only Crime is Caring!

0
6,000
SIGNATURE GOAL

Petition to the Executive Committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan 

To: Dr. Alan John Beggs, Dr. Jurgen Gabriel Maslany, Dr. Oladapo Adesanya Mabadeje, Dr. Sarah Rose Mueller, Lionel Chabot, Burton O’Soup

Re: Dr. Terence Davids, File # 01.2024.D

We, the undersigned, call on you to withdraw the charge of “unprofessional conduct” brought against Dr. Terence Davids, laid on February 13, 2024.

Your charge is irrational and discriminatory, amounting to the persecution of a doctor for following his Christian religion and medical ethics.

When Patient number 1 came to Dr. Davids to have her pregnancy assessed for an abortion, Dr. Davids expressed legitimate concern for both her and her preborn child. Both her and her preborn child are deserving of care, compassion, and the best available medical advice and treatment.

In Dr. Davids’ professional opinion, an abortion was not medically necessary, so he advised her to reconsider. It was legitimate for him to offer this medical advice. Pregnancy is not a disease, and abortion is not a treatment or cure but rather an elective option usually committed for reasons of lifestyle convenience.

According to a 2020 UC San Francisco study that favours abortion (Rocca, Samari, et al.), 17% of women have negative feelings immediately after an abortion procedure, and 12% have mixed feelings. A comprehensive literature review by David C. Reardon (SAGE Open Medicine, 2018) shows significant mental health impacts after abortion. In light of these facts, advising against abortion is not unreasonable.

Additionally, in keeping with the tenets of his Christian religion, Dr. Davids was bound to share the spiritual concerns he had regarding Patient number 1’s intended abortion of her preborn child. He did not force her to accept his religion or spend time explaining its doctrines, but merely inquired if she shared his beliefs or not. He also expressed a hope for her preborn child that was well-intentioned, kind, and consistent with the Hippocratic Oath to “do no harm” to any patient, be it the mother or the child in her womb.

According to the Holy Bible, the book that binds Dr. Davids’ beliefs, “You shall not murder.” (Exodus 20:13). See also Psalm 139:13 and Exodus 21:22-25. As well, the Hippocratic Oath, the basis for medical ethics, states, “I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion.”

If Patient number 1 felt uncomfortable and anxious after her visit, this was not caused by Dr. Davids. Her own decision to electively abort her preborn child, and the implications of that decision, were the only source of her anxiety and discomfort. It is not Dr. Davids’ job to absolve her conscience.

Dr. Davids carried out his professional duties in all his dealings with Patient number 1 with integrity, honesty, and compassion, and was in line with the Hippocratic Oath. His words and actions were legitimately informed by his medical ethics and religion. He deserves to be commended, not persecuted, for this.

Sign This Petition Now!

Do you wish to send a postcard?

(Note: If you choose Yes, CLC will mail a physical postcard, pictured here, in your name, to the petition target(s). You'll be asked to donate $1.75 toward the cost of postage & printing)

Postcard Sample

Signatures

Thus far 5115 signatories
Page 117 of 341
Jorge F. Harrison Hot Springs, BC
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:51am
A caring doctor, guilty as charged.
Rita B. , 0
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:51am
Jane M. Medicine Hat, AB
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:48am
“Then Mordecai told them to reply to Esther, ‘Do not imagine that you in the king’s palace can escape any more than all the Jews. For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place and you and your father’s house will perish. And who knows whether you have not attained ro
Dale W. Chilliwack, BC
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:42am
Lindsay H. Two Hills, AB
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:37am
Anonymous Chester, ON
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:34am
Giving a patient every option is choice. This is what Dr David did. Forcing the provider to accept your option the only one, is doing exactly what you’re accusing him of. Every provider is human. He has his own patient experiences, and his own mind; doctors aren’t robots. This is why it’s the art of medicine and not the science
Anonymous Fisher Branch, MB
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:33am
Anonymous , BC
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:30am
Troy G. Conklin,
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:29am
ESTHER Z. SCARBOROUGH, ON
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:29am
Leanne W. Moose Jaw, SK
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:23am
Andy D. Troy, ON
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:18am
Steve J. Peterborough, ON
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:13am
We need MORE, not fewer, such conscientious, caring doctors.
Denise D. Summerside , PE
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:12am
As a physician, Dr David’s took an oath to “ do no harm”. This oath extends to his unborn patients, who are very much alive with a beating heart. Consider the mental anguish and violation of conscience the abortion of that child would inflict upon Dr Davids. Is justice served by robbing his other patients of a doctors care?
Anonymous Thurso, QC
Apr 29, 2024 - 11:04am