Action Centre

Don't Take Away Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly

Background on the Issue
On May 29, 2017, MPP Yasir Naqvi, the previous Attorney General of Ontario, announced that he would table a bill in the fall to transform public sidewalks into “No Free Speech Zones” outside every abortion facility in the province. The bill was passed in October later that year, and has been put into force since February 1, 2018.

These bubble zones within which pro-life speech and expression are banned, prevent pro-lifers from demonstrating or counselling within a certain radius of an abortion facility where children are killed by abortion. That includes hospitals and clinics where abortions are committed, and pharmacies are now able to apply as well. These bubble zones are expected to resemble British Columbia's and Newfoundland and Labrador’s, which have bubble zone laws “not exceeding 50 metres” around abortion facilities.

Use the automated tool below to quickly send your local MPP a pre-written message. You can also add to the pre-written message with your own, personalized note. To view and select an alternate pre-written message, refresh your browser screen. After sending your email, a blind copy will also be sent to your inbox, for your own records.
Show More Background
Step 1: Compose your message
Local MPP
Bogus excuse to discriminate
Dear [Recipient's riding name will be automatically inserted] MPP [Recipient's name will be automatically inserted],

I write to you today as a concerned constituent in the riding of [Recipient's riding name will be automatically inserted]. For a quick background: the previous Attorney General of Ontario has passed a bubble zone law. Bubble zones are ‘no free speech zones’ around abortion facilities, where offering information that might cause a person to reconsider abortion, is banned. The ostensible reason for bubble zones is to protect those entering abortion facilities from potential violence.

The facts provided by the abortion industry itself proves that pro-life demonstrators are peaceful, as a rule. For instance, of the seven Ontario abortion facilities that responded to a 2012 survey called Abortion health services in Canada, zero reported picketing with interference or vandalism.

If there was picketing, it was done without interference. Other provinces compared similarly, prompting the authors of the survey to admit that, “Canadian facilities reported minimal or no harassment, in stark contrast to American facilities that responded to the same survey.”

The minimal harassment they mention mainly refers to allegedly “harassing emails” or “phone calls”, which obviously could not be prevented by a physical bubble zone. Even those situations are suspect however, given the inherent reporting bias of the for-profit abortionist who owns the “clinic”, in whose financial interests it would be to keep pro-lifers away, so as to maximize customers and revenues.
* - Required Fields